Peer Review Process

Every article was published in the Journal of the Shof Journal of Arts and Humanity through the process of double-blind peer-review by a peer-reviewer of Shof Journal of Arts and Humanity.

Articles submitted are reviewed by the editorial team as the initial process. The editorial team will evaluate the feasibility of the content, focus, and methodology in the article. The articles are then sent to one reviewer at the position of Double Blind Review. Notes from the reviewer are then sent back to the author to be adapted to the standards of journal writing. The decision of the revised manuscript will be re-evaluated in the meeting of the editorial board. Later, the decision of the editor in the final meeting will be informed to the author.

Editor of Shof Journal of Arts and Humanity responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted must be published. Validation of these works and their importance for researchers and readers should always push the decision. The editor can be guided by a policy board of editors of the journal and is limited by law as to be enforced regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism (plagiarism). Editors can confer with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision